Speaking of Reading, the Kindle
Amazon has come out with its often discussed new upgrade of the reader called Kindle, and I would be tempted to start lusting after one. But though I take drops every day to keep glaucoma under control, and though I have a set of prescription glasses, and though I have mild cataracts in both eyes, especially in the right, I am still trying to make it through with naked eye or my el cheapo reading glasses. So the 6-inch KIndle screen doesn't say much to me, when I am seldom far from my little battery of desktop computers with a 23-inch monitor for a couple and a 19-inch on the others (via the wonders of KVM switches). So that looks like yet another great argument for staying home as much as I do, and I don't see why I would need a Kindle, though admittedly it's probably no worse than reading my now very aged paperbacks.
My wife swears by using the local public library almost exclusively, but I get most of the books I read from our own shelves. Admittedly, quite often lately I've ended up with a pile of loose, crumbling pages with fading print and for which a binding is very much a thing of the past. But this is why I bought those books and then held on to them for such a long time, just for later times like these. And at this point it's like I'm reading them all for the first time, though actually I did read most of them a while ago, and some more than once. I figure that for me, the passage of about 10 years is enough to make any book a brand new read again, and all I retain is a general impression of whether or not it was a good book.
I wish I knew somebody around here who has a Kindle, so that I could get a first-hand look. My wife belongs to a very active book club, and I think she does know somebody who has one. I'll have to ask, when she gets back from another of her long visits to Florida.
My wife swears by using the local public library almost exclusively, but I get most of the books I read from our own shelves. Admittedly, quite often lately I've ended up with a pile of loose, crumbling pages with fading print and for which a binding is very much a thing of the past. But this is why I bought those books and then held on to them for such a long time, just for later times like these. And at this point it's like I'm reading them all for the first time, though actually I did read most of them a while ago, and some more than once. I figure that for me, the passage of about 10 years is enough to make any book a brand new read again, and all I retain is a general impression of whether or not it was a good book.
I wish I knew somebody around here who has a Kindle, so that I could get a first-hand look. My wife belongs to a very active book club, and I think she does know somebody who has one. I'll have to ask, when she gets back from another of her long visits to Florida.
1 Comments:
I wish you were close enough to take a look at mine. One of the bonuses of the Kindle is that you can change the font size, so it would easier on your eyes than those paperbacks. I love mine.
Post a Comment
<< Home